Artificial Intelligence and Professional Responsibility: Upholding Ethics in the Age of Machine Assistance

 In today's professional landscape, AI is no longer a tool of speculation. It is actively reshaping how we diagnose diseases, draft legal documents, evaluate credit risk, teach students, and more. The possibilities are great: faster diagnosis, wider access to services, deeper insight into complex data. Yet this rapid shift raises a profound and pressing question: when professionals rely on AI, who is accountable for mistakes, oversights, or ethical missteps that follow? The answer emerging across fields is that AI may augment capability, but it cannot relieve human professionals of the ethical duties which have long defined their roles.

Take health care. AI systems today assist in radiology, pathology, diagnostics, monitoring, and even predictive care. While they bring real promise, studies show some image analysis algorithms can match or exceed human specialists in narrow tasks; they also bring real risks of error, bias, or overreliance. One particularly telling example involves a 2024 research paper by Google Health with their Med Gemini model, which included in its text a diagnosis of an old left basilar ganglia infarct, a body part that does not exist as described, conflating the basilar artery and basal ganglia. That oversight was not trivial. It showed how AI-derived output could appear authoritative and yet rest on a fundamental error in anatomy. Some clinicians asked, "What happens when clinicians don't notice?"

The problem is not just conceptual. Research into medical AI liability warns that healthcare professionals may still incur responsibility when using AI tools. A 2023 and 2024 review of legal and regulatory issues in medical AI concluded that liability may arise not only from using AI incorrectly, but also from failing to use it when it was reasonably available. For example, if a hospital deploys an FDA-cleared AI diagnostic tool and a clinician ignores it without justification, the clinician may face claims of negligence for not utilizing state-of-the-art assistance. As AI becomes more autonomous, the question of who did what becomes murky. Is the doctor responsible, the hospital, or the AI vendor? In many jurisdictions, no clear answer exists yet. Bias and fairness are intertwined with these challenges. A 2023 article in Frontiers in Pharmacology warned that AI driven healthcare in Africa faces specific challenges because many datasets and algorithms have been developed in high income countries and may not generalize. If an algorithm performs poorly in a Ugandan context, whose responsibility is that? The professional used it, the vendor built it, the regulator accepted it? In many countries these questions are still being debated.

Beyond healthcare, the legal profession is already in real disruption. Real-world cases show how AI misuse is causing serious consequences. A recent report found more than 120 documented incidents worldwide in which court filings contained AI-generated fabricated legal citations or case quotes. In Mata v. Avianca, Inc. in the U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., June 22, 2023, attorneys submitted a brief with six non-existent precedents generated by AI. The court dismissed the case and fined the law firm. A UK High Court judge warned that the citation of 18 nonexistent cases in a £90 million lawsuit and five in a housing claim were traced to AI-generated authorities. The judge noted that the misuse of AI poses serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence. Another Australian case involved defense counsel apologizing for submitting documents with fabricated quotes and fictitious legal citations generated by AI in a serious murder case.

These examples expose the risk of over-reliance on AI in legal work. Many lawyers use generative AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude to draft memos, briefs, and research outlines. While 63 percent of lawyers surveyed in 2024 said they had used AI in their work, the adoption of AI does not absolve professional obligations. Competence, diligence, maintaining client confidentiality, and supervising non-lawyer assistance-including AI-remain core duties.

AI is used for credit scoring, robo-advisory, algorithmic trading, and fraud detection in financial services. Although high-profile sanctions for mistakes derived from AI are rare, regulators have made it quite plain that senior management and boards cannot delegate responsibility simply because an algorithm generated a recommendation. The European Securities and Markets Authority has warned that firms using AI must maintain human oversight, transparency, and accountability. What this means is that if an investment firm deploys an AI algorithm that later generates a defective outcome, the human professionals behind it remain answerable. Across these sectors several themes emerge. Accountability stays human. Whether doctor, lawyer, educator, or financial professional, the user of AI remains responsible for outcomes. A physician cannot say “the AI told me so,” a lawyer cannot say “the algorithm drafted that,” and a financial adviser cannot say “the model convinced me.” Professionals are accountable for exercising judgment, verifying outputs, communicating with clients or patients, recognizing context, and fulfilling ethical duties.

Technological competence is now part of professionalism. Professionals must understand the tools they deploy. In law, one empirical study found that legal research tools labeled hallucination free still generated fabricated content between 17 and 33 percent of the time. Automation bias has been noted in medicine, too, where clinicians overtrusted AI outputs when human judgment would have flagged an error. Findings of this sort indicate that professionals should now understand how AI works and fails, how it's trained, validated, and what biases it might carry.

Transparency and informed consent also matter. If AI plays a non-trivial role in diagnosis, advice, or outcome, those affected need to be told about the tool's function, limitations, and human judgment being involved. Patients, clients, or students must not be surprised that a machine contributed to a decision that affects them. For healthcare, patients may need to be informed when an AI diagnostic tool was used, what oversight has been applied, and how final decisions were made. Lack of disclosure may strengthen claims if harm results.

Ethical and regulatory frameworks are evolving but unevenly. In law, judge-made sanctions, and professional guidance such as from the American Bar Association, are already in place. In medicine, regulators, and boards are issuing recommendations, but few definitive laws exist. Though AI may reduce diagnostic error-estimated to be a cause of up to one-third of malpractice claims-it also creates new liability risks for clinicians and vendors. In many jurisdictions-mostly in Africa-regulatory guidance is still emerging, and professionals therefore face greater ambiguity and risk.

Critics also point to deeper risks of AI in professional settings. Deskilling occurs as professionals may become less vigilant when they trust AI outputs. Bias and inequity arise when AI systems are trained on datasets that do not reflect diverse populations, disadvantaging underrepresented groups. Opacity and black box reasoning make it difficult for professionals to explain or contest outputs. As AI becomes widespread, standards of care may shift. Ignoring AI could be seen as negligent, or failing to override an AI error could generate liability. This dynamic is already being debated in both legal and medical literature.

Responsible professional practice requires that AI be treated as an assistant, not a decision-maker. Professionals need to establish robust protocols for the review, verification, and validation of AI outputs. They also need to build technological literacy, communicate the role and the limits of AI to those they serve, engage with professional and regulatory frameworks, and be attuned to contextual risks. In places like Uganda or much of Africa, biases in the data, infrastructure gaps, regulatory lags, and resource limitations tend to increase the risks involved with the adoption of AI tools developed elsewhere. This is a time of immense promise for AI in professional practice. Faster diagnostics, smarter contracts, dynamic financial models, and personalized education point to a very different, and brighter, future. But it's a future that depends on how we integrate AI responsibly. The hallmark of professionalism in the machine-assisted era will not be whether professionals use the latest algorithm, but whether they can say: "I used this tool thoughtfully, I understood its limits, I verified its output, I communicated its role, and I take responsibility for the outcome." Excellence will not be defined by the adoption of AI; responsible integration and ethical oversight will define excellence. The future belongs to professionals who use AI and own their human judgment in tandem. The machines may assist, but the moral and ethical responsibility remains wholly human.

References

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Tech Companies Foster Cyber Abuse Through Negligence

HOW TECH COMPANIES FOSTER CYBER ABUSE THROUGH NEGLIGENCE Introduction In the digital age, the influence of technology companies on online communication has been significant. They determine how individuals transact with peers and how much data is obtained- whether publicly available or private. While these companies are building platforms to connect the world, they also need to ensure user safety too. Nevertheless, by negligence through not enforcing their security protocols, insufficient attention to content moderation, and placing profit above matters of user welfare- this has fostered cyber abuse. This article focuses on the various ways in which tech companies encourage cyber abuse through their negligence. It discusses inadequate data protection, algorithmic biases (caused by existing cultural assumptions that the company repeats) in computer-aided decision making and policing for Internet abuse, lax content moderation, and lack of (or sometimes active sabotage to) regulatory c...
Read more

Innovating Legal and Legislative Solutions for Human Trafficking in Uganda

Human trafficking, a clandestine crime that exploits the vulnerable for forced labor, sexual exploitation, and various forms of abuse, casts a pervasive shadow over nations worldwide. Among these nations is Uganda, a country grappling with the intricate challenges of being both a source and destination for human trafficking. In this extensive exploration, we delve into the multifaceted layers of issues surrounding human trafficking in Uganda, emphasizing the indispensable need for innovative legal strategies and legislative amendments to effectively combat this gross violation of human rights. To appreciate the urgency of the situation, an examination of the statistical landscape of human trafficking in Uganda is imperative. Reports from the International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimate that thousands of men, women, and children fall prey to trafficking within and across Uganda's borders each year. [1] This covert crime, with its devastating consequences, poses a sever...
Read more

MY 27TH BIRTHDAY GIFT TO THE FUTURE OF KWANIA CHILDREN: Empowering Education Through the Back to School Mission 2025.

As I turn 27, I reflect on the journey that has shaped who I am today—a lawyer, career coach, and advocate for social justice and education. Growing up in northern Uganda, I was a survivor of the LRA insurgencies in the early 2000s, and my experience during those difficult times instilled in me a deep understanding of the power of education. Education was, and still is, the key to overcoming the challenges I faced, and it continues to serve as the gateway to breaking generational cycles of poverty.   My educational journey has not been easy, but it has fueled my passion for empowering others. Completing my law degree and establishing myself as a career coach, I’ve worked closely with young professionals to guide them through their career paths. These experiences have helped me realize the importance of creating access to education, especially for children in underserved communities.     Kwania District, my home district, has always held a special place in my heart. T...
Read more